Sunday, February 24, 2013

Rape Statistics

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and it’s reporting of crime within the state of Massachusetts, out of a state total population of 6,587,536 people that were covered, 1,628 of the crimes reported were forcible rape (The, 2011).

Massachusetts Statutes of Limitations

According to the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN), in the state of Massachusetts the statutes of limitations section includes statutes for sexual offenses, time limitation for prosecution and DNA exception.

The statutes for sexual offenses include wanton or reckless behavior creating a risk of bodily injury or sexual abuse to a child, rape, rape of a child, statutes including rape of a child with different details such as use of force, rape by previously convicted offenders, a combination of rape and abuse and the age difference between the child and the offender. Sexual offense statutes also include assault with intent to commit rape, assault of a child with the intent to commit rape, prostitution/sexual behavior, drugging people for intercourse, inducing a person under the age of 18 into having intercourse, owner of place inducing or suffering person to resort in such place for sexual intercourse. Also included are statutes for open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior, incestuous marriage or sexual activities, crime against nature, unnatural or lascivious acts, and such acts with a child under 16 (Rape, 2009).  

Moreover, the time limitations for the prosecution of specific sexual offenses are explained more in depth under the section. For those statutes including wanton or reckless behavior creating a risk of bodily injury or sexual abuse to a child, any sort of rape of a child, any sort of rape and abuse to a child and assault on a child under 16 years of age with intent to commit rape, explained more in depth within the section, have no time limit. For such offenses as rape and assault with intent to commit rape, the offender may be prosecuted within 15 years after commission of the offense. For incest, offenders may be prosecuted within 10 years after commission of the offense. For certain offenses if the victim is under the age of 16 at the time of commission of the offense, the period of limitation will not begin until victim reaches the age of 16 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency, whichever should occur first; these are explained more in depth in such section. Finally, in the state of Massachusetts there is no specified DNA exception (Rape, 2009).

What is Rape?

According to Clark University >>Dean of Students >> A Definition of Rape, Sexual Assault and Related Terms, rape is a legal term that is defined by 3 elements in Massachusetts. These elements include penetration of any orifice by any object, force or threat of force or sexual contact against the will of the victim. “Consent cannot be given (legally) if a person is impaired, intoxicated, drugged, underage, mentally challenged, unconscious, or asleep" (Clark, 2013). 

Massachusetts Rape Laws

According to the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries >> Laws by Subject>> Mass. Law About >> Rape and Sexual Assault, the laws in Massachusetts regarding rape include general rape, drugging the victim, rape of a child with and without force and other specialized categories.

Under the section rape generally, such cases in which there was a” lack of consent due to intoxication” (Massachusetts, 2012) , the prosecution must prove that the intoxication was enough to cause the victim incapable of consent and that the offender knew or should have known that the victim was incapable of consent given the situation. In such cases where there is evidence that the offender suffered mental impairment, the prosecution must not only prove that the offender should have known that the victim was incapable of consent “but the offender is also entitled to have the jury instructed that they may consider credible evidence of his mental incapacity, by intoxication or otherwise” (Massachusetts, 2012). Also stated is that “intercourse in which consent is achieved by fraud does not constitute rape” (Massachusetts, 2012). Under the section drugging the victim, it is explained that making drugs and/or alcohol available to the victim is not enough to be convicted under drugging for sexual intercourse (Massachusetts, 2012).

Under the section rape of a child without force, there are laws for cases with such a child under 14, child under 16 and child under 18; all explained more in depth without the section. On the other hand under the section rape of a child with force, there are only laws for cases with such a child under 16. The other specialized categories section includes laws for elderly or disabled person and mentally retarded person (Massachusetts, 2012). 

Rape Case in Massachusetts

According to Foxnews.com, Massachusetts babysitter John Burbine, 49, “faces 40 counts of aggravated rape of a child by force, 18 counts of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14 years old, 13 counts of posing a child in a state of nudity, 14 counts of possession of child pornography and two counts of dissemination of child pornography. He also faces one charge of operating a daycare without a license” (Fox, 2012). According to authorities, Burbine raped and sexually abused 13 children, ranging from the ages of 8 days to 3 years old. At the time the news article was written he had pleaded not guilty to 100 charges. Burbine was held 90 days without bail. After these 90 days his bail will be set at one million. He and his wife “advertised day care and tutoring services on parenting and coupon service websites” (Fox, 2012). He was scheduled to appear in court January 15, 2013 (Fox, 2012).

Media Portrayal

Below are two videos that have been created concerning rape and sexual assault. These videos have been created to spread awareness of the problem.

This video was made in order to spread awareness to the public of how the media portrays rape in our culture. I feel that this video very accurately represents how media skews the image of what rape is and how it is skewed in some sort of joking matter. As the video says, "change media, change society. Stop Rape.

This video was made in order to show how certain situations may be thought of differently by the victim and the offender. The offender may believe that the victim wants it when in reality they do not. I feel that this video also very accurately represents the idea of rape in our society. This misconception and misunderstanding between victim and offender is "common" in the crime of rape in our society and so is another problem mentioned in the video; blaming the victim.

References

Clark University. (2013). Dean of Students: A Definition of Rape, Sexual Assault, and Related Terms. Retrieved from http://www.clarku.edu/offices/dos/survivorguide/definition.cfm

Fox News. (2012). Massachusetts babysitter accused of raping 13 children pleads not guilty to 100 charges. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/12/massachusetts-babysitter-accused-raping-13-children-pleads-not-guilty-to-100/

Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries. (2012). Massachusetts Law About Rape and Sexual Assault. Retrieved from http://www.lawlib.state.ma.us/subject/about/rape.html  

Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network. (2009). Statutes of Limitations: Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://rainn.org/public-policy/legal-resources/massachusetts/statutes-of-limitations

The Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2011). Crime in the United States 2011. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-5

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Hate Crime Statistics

According to The Federal Bureau of Investigation >> Hate Crime Statistics 2011, hate crime statistics for the year 2011 in the state of Massachusetts show that within the 6,361,208 people that were in the "population covered", 80 incident reports were submitted (Federal, 2011).

Massachusetts Hate Crime Laws 

According to the State Hate Crimes Statutory Provisions of the State of Massachusetts, the following is covered under state law:
  • Bias-Motivated Violence and Intimidation
  • Civil Action
    • Race, Religion and Ethnicity
      • Interference with Religious Worship
    • Sexual Orientation
    • Disability
  • Institutional Vandalism
  • Data Collection
  • Training for Law Enforcement Personnel
It is important to note that gender and "other" are not covered under state law (State, n.d).

Moreover, according to the Congressional Research Service concerning states statutes governing hate crimes, there are also statutes for crime/penalty enhancement, institutional vandalism, data collection and law enforcement training. The statutes for crime/penalty enhancement state that no person "shall by force or threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, or suppress or threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege" (Congressional, 2010) secured to him/her by the constitution or laws of the United States. They also provide penalties for commission of assault, battery upon a person and damages made to real or personal property, for individuals with the intent to intimidate such a person because of  their religion, race, national origin, color, disability or sexual orientation. The statute for institutional vandalism provides penalties for anyone who willfully, intentionally and without right, destroys, defaces or injures a church, synagogue or other buildings of worship, schools, community centers and any adjacent land owned  by any of the property. The statute for data collection states that "The Colonel of State Police shall promulgate regulations relative to the collection of hate crime data" (Congressional, 2010).  Finally, the statute for law enforcement training states that the municipal police training committee will provide instructions for police officers dealing with hate crime related incidents (Congressional, 2010). 

Racially-Motivated Church Arson, Springfield, MA

According to The United States Department of Justice >> Office of Public Affairs, on January 27, 2009, three men by the names of Benjamin Haskell, 22, Michael Jacques, 24 and Thomas Gleason, 21 were indicted by a federal grand jury in the District of Massachusetts for "conspiring to interfere with the civil rights of members of the Macedonia Church of God in Christ, a Springfield, Mass., church with a predominantly African-American congregation" (Office, 2009). The church's new building was burnt down November 5, 2008, just hours after the election of President Barack Obama. The indictment alleged that the three men "conspired to burn the church in retaliation for the election of the country's first African-American president" (Office,2009). Furthermore, the indictment also stated that on election night, Haskell, Jacques and Gleason "used racial slurs and expressed anger with the election of Barack Obama and discussed burning the Macedonia Church of God in Christ's new church building because the church members, congregants and bishop were African-American" (Office,2009) which Haskell, Jacques and Gleason later admitted to (United, 2011). The new building was almost entirely destroyed, after they poured gasoline all through the interior and exterior and set it on fire. Firefighters attending the scene were said to suffer injuries as they worked to extinguish the fire (Office,2009). The case was to be further investigated by many different departments.

After further investigation, according to The United States Department of Justice >> The United States Attorney's Office District of Massachusetts, on April 14, 2011 Michael Jacques, 26, was convicted of three crimes related to the burning of the church. Those charges included:
Count One: Conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate the mostly African American parishioners of the Macedonia Church of God in Christ in the free exercise of the right to hold and use their new church building which was under construction; 
Count Two: Damaging the parishioners’ new church building through arson and obstructing their free exercise of religion because of their race, color and ethnic characteristics; and 
Count Three: Using fire to commit Counts One and Two (United, 2011).
Benjamin Haskell had previously pleaded guilty, where he was sentenced to nine years in prison. Thomas Gleason also pleaded guilty and his sentencing was scheduled April 28, 2011. Sentencing for Michael Jacques was scheduled for September 15, 2011 by Judge Ponsor. Jacques "faces up to 20 years imprisonment, to be followed by five years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine on each count" (United, 2011). 

Media Portrayal

Below are two media portrayals, a video and movie trailer, that have both been created with the intent to raise awareness concerning issues involving hate crimes.

This video was made with the intent of it's title; to persuade the public to take action against hate crimes. Throughout this video you are given statistics about hate crimes and are told the sad and unfortunate stories of past victims who have suffered through such misfortune. Take action now!

This clip is the trailer to a hit independent film "Hate Crime." A gay man moves into a new neighborhood, only to find out that his new neighbor feels very strongly his sexual orientation. A hate crime is committed and the neighbor quickly becomes a suspect. 

References

Congressional Research Service. (2010). State Statutes Governing Hate Crimes. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33099.pdf


Office of Public Affairs, The United States Department of Justice. (2009). Three Men Indicted for Racially-Motivated Church Arson in Springfield, Mass.. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/January/09-crt-067.html 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2011). Hate Crime Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/tables/table-12

The United States Attorney's Office District of Massachusetts, The United States Department of Justice. (2011). Springfield Man Convicted of Church Arson. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/usao/ma/news/2011/April/JacquesMichaelVerdictPR.html 

State Hate Crimes Statutory Provisions. (n.d.). Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://archive.adl.org/learn/hate_crimes_laws/map_frameset.html